| |
America's
Tragedy: An Islamic Perspective
Question and Answer Session
By Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
Questions:
Shaykh Hamza: I thought he seemed to
be listening very attentively to what I had to say. When I mentioned a couple
things, he confirmed them: he said "I agree with you wholeheartedly." He also
mentioned to one of the aides that what we had to say was useful. I think about
four or five times, he came up to me and shook my hand very firmly and thanked
me as what seemed to be a very hearty thanks for just coming and edifying him.
So, that was my take on it. I was impressed: there were only three of us who
spoke in the meeting, including Franklin Graham, who said he was willing to go
wherever to service the troops if there was going to be a war; and the Jewish
man, who said that he hoped that the President would reconsider the war and that
he thought that war was the worst thing that they could do. He also asked people
to pray, to go back to their communities and pray.
I did mention Afghanistan to him. I
told him that the Afghanis have been so hard-hit, and they cannot take anymore
and that the vast majority of them are innocent people. I mentioned that more
innocent blood is going to further polarize the world, and that there are going
to be more Muslims who view America as inherently belligerent towards Muslims,
and this could turn into a major Muslim-Christian battle. He said that this was
also a major fear of theirs. He said that he was rebuked for using the word
"crusade." He said when he said it he did not mean any religious connotation,
but it was the first word that came to him, so there seems to be a real concern
here. I think that there was deliberation here because it looked like they were
just going to go bomb like crazy at first, and I'm really hoping and praying to
Allah that it doesn't escalate.
Shaykh Hamza: I would talk to ING
about that. One of the things that I am hoping for is that people who have been
students here, who should have learned something, get more involved. Not
everybody is a public speaker, but there are a lot of things you can do. You can
write letters to the editor; you can support people, but we need more people to
get active. We have a real dearth of spokespeople for Muslims right now, and we
need intelligent discourse. The beauty of intelligence is that people recognize
it, and they listen to it. If you make sense to people, they tend to respond.
Unfortunately, people who are called sophists, who are people that use sophistry
and demagogy, can do the same thing, but whenever you get a sophist against
somebody who is logical, you will always see the sophist lose. The dialogues of
Socrates are some of the best examples because he went up against some brilliant
sophists, and they would always fall apart when he would debate them because he
knew how to pull their arguments apart. That is why I think that if Muslims
could get out there and just speak from the heart, it would make a real
difference.
I think duplicity is a really
dangerous thing. Our public and private discourses have to be the same because
one of the things they are trying to do now is undermine the public discourse of
the Muslims. What they did to Dr. Siddiqi was really malignant because he was at
the National Cathedral and gave that prayer, and he also met with President
Bush, and they had him on Fox News from some old video saying that he supported
Hizbullah and Hamas and things like that. Then they were calling him, "terrorist
in the White House" and things like that. We are no longer in the little leagues
anymore. We have hit mainstream. Muslim voices are getting on major networks.
There are people who make their livelihood assassinating the characters of other
people, so we have to pray for our brothers and sisters out there as well. They
can take things out of context; they can manipulate; they can do what ever they
want, but Allah is the Protector of those who believe. Allah protects those who
believe.
Shaykh Hamza: I think that the area
that we are in is probably one of the safest areas in America, but there are
other areas where it is dangerous. Shaykh Abdullah Bin Bayyah gave a fatwa, and
it was a very good, sound fatwa. His point was that if Muslim women were in
danger of being harmed or accosted, they should not go out, and if they have to
go out, he said that they are not obliged to wear the hijab. That is what
he said. He gave all his usuli proofs for it, so I would stipulate with
that that if there are dire circumstances, then that is a dire rukhsa
from a person with a valid license in Islamic law because Islam is an
intelligent religion. The laws are there to serve human beings; we are not there
to serve the law. We are there to serve Allah, and that is why whenever the law
does not serve you, you are permitted to abandon it, and that is actually
following the law. That is where the confusion lies because people do not
realize that. The law is for our benefit, not for our harm. Therefore, if the
law harms us, we no longer have to abide by it. For example, pig is prohibited
because it harms us, but if we are going to die without eating pig, we do not
follow the law anymore because now the law says eat the pig. If you are
worshipping the law, then you cannot understand that. You cannot worship the
sacred law because the law is there to serve you; it is for your maslaha,
your benefit, and that is our fiqh.
At night, especially, people have to
be careful. It is always better to be in groups. Generally in most places,
people will come to your defense. There is a lot of sensitivity in this area.
There are non-Muslim women all over the country who have been wearing scarves in
solidarity with the Muslim women. It has been shown all over. I would recommend
having a PR campaign. Show pictures of Mary Magdalene or the Virgin Mary since
they are basically wearing the hijab, and explain that this is a sign of
purity as it always has been, so people should not desecrate it. Do this to
remind them that it is from their own tradition. Also, have a picture of a nun
next to a Muslim woman, and ask why is one pure and the other impure? By what
criteria are you judging? You can do things like that just to take things home
to people.
Shaykh Hamza: The first question is
very serious because there are a lot of children in the schools who are being
blamed by people. Children really can be very cruel. I hate the idea of group
mentality, groupthink, cliques, gangs, and clubs because children really suffer
in such environments. School is meant to be a place where you enhance your mind,
not where the mind is shrunk, so I think it is time to consider home schooling
or Muslim schools. I think public schools are difficult places, but people are
different. If you are in a more educated area, I think you will come across more
people who do not have those attitudes. Also, in the real underbelly areas,
underclass areas, people, especially African-American communities, tend to know
about Islam, and they know Islam is a good thing. A lot of African-Americans in
this culture have a good view of Islam, and that is positive because there has
been a lot of work done in those areas to take that message out to people.
I thing there is more of a problem in
the middle-America type scene. I think you need to talk to your children a lot.
My son saw one of those films of these hooded guys breaking in, and there was a
cross that he attacked. My son said to me, "Oh, those could not be Muslims," and
I asked why not? He replied, "A Muslim would never attack a cross." That is just
how he saw it, and that is true. We do not desecrate crosses. That is a sacred
symbol of their religion. Sayyiduna Umar did not desecrate crosses when he went
into Jerusalem. Jerusalem was opened by the Muslims; the keys were given to the
Muslims.
This is an opportunity for our
children to be proud and to let others know, "terrorism is not my religion." Do
not teach them to be cow-tailed and to capitulate to that type of pressure. It
is important for them to be affirmative. Children tend to respect courage. The
thing a bully loves most is that you just fall apart. If you stand up to him,
even if you lose the fight, everybody has respect for you afterwards.
Shaykh Hamza: I do not like to get
into Afghani politics because it is very complicated, but I think we should be
against war. I personally am totally against modern warfare; I really am. I
think Muslims should be much more outspoken about the prohibitions. Gai Eaton
wrote a book saying that Muslim scholars have taken positions about emulsifiers
and biscuit ingredients that are dubious, but somehow, they just have not really
come out and condemned modern warfare for what it is; it is evil. Modern warfare
uses weapons of mass destruction, and we do not believe in weapons of mass
destruction. We can say they have them, so we need them. Well, take that to its
logical conclusion. They can destroy us, so we have to be able to destroy them.
Well, if everybody can destroy everybody else, I guess we are all going to be
destroyed. It is called, "Mutually Assured Destruction: MAD." That is what they
used to call it in the Cold War. The logic used is that if they can wipe us all
out, we should at least be able to get our missiles off before their missiles
hit us and wipe us all out; at least we will wipe them all out too, so we all
get wiped out, and nobody wins. Great. That is not an end or aim of shari'a.
You cannot kill with fire, which eliminates nuclear power. No one can kill with
fire except the Lord of fire. You cannot poison, so there goes biological and
chemical warfare. "Do not poison the wells of your enemies." Well, what does
that mean? Who is going to drink the water? They are and their animals, which
means they would die of chemicals. So, we are told, do not use chemical warfare
either. There goes modern warfare. In addition, we are prohibited from
indiscriminate killing. So, we should speak out against this stuff. We should be
at the forefront of the movement against weapons of mass destruction, really.
Shaykh Hamza: I think that there are
a lot of good people in such movements. For example, the people with KPFA are
good people. Also, my brother was saying he wants to put an Afghani flag on his
car, and my mother keeps saying, "We are to blame." She was in the Civil Rights
era, and she did a lot of work in the anti-war movements. She is against all
that stuff. She said we pay our taxes, and so we have some complicity in all
this stuff that is happening. There are a lot of Americans who know that. They
are an intelligent minority because a lot of people do not know. Even
intelligent, educated Americans have no knowledge of what goes on in the rest of
the world, and you know that. You see it again and again. Really, intelligent
people who are really good in their fields know nothing about the types of
suffering that are going on in other parts of the world.
On the other hand, from a Quranic
perspective, we also have to get out of pointing our fingers and blaming the
West all the time because that is an empty, disempowering road to go down.
Muslims need to take some responsibility for why we have the most corrupt
countries on the planet. You just cannot blame the West for that. Nobody puts a
gun to your head and forces you to take bribes, but that is what happens in the
Muslim countries. You can blame it on the conditions, but what brought about the
conditions? The West? Well, what brought about the West? Allah is in charge of
the universe or not? He gives His dominion to whomever He pleases. In other
words, Muslims are not the only ones who get dominion in this world, and if He
gives it to other than Muslims, it is because Muslims cannot handle it. Think
about that.
Everybody says the Americans do all
this terrible stuff around the world. The only reason that Muslim countries are
not doing it is because they do not have the power. That is why they can only do
it to their own population, and I am serious about this. All they can do is
torture, persecute, and oppress their own population because they are not able
to do it outside of their own country whereas there is a lot of bad stuff going
on outside this country and bad stuff that goes on inside this country as well,
but that is the reality of it. We are in a bad situation all around, but this is
the best world that we have, and it is the one that Allah gave us. This is it,
and all we can do is work to make the whole thing better. That is our role,
historically. As Muslims, we have to stand for the truth and with those who
speak the truth whether it comes from us or from others.
Shaykh Hamza: I think it is important
to tell people that murder is not a reason for being out of Islam. Whether he
did this or not, he claims he did not do it, and people are presumed innocent
until proven guilty. There needs to be due process of the law in terms of this
incident. In terms of Bin Laden, from what I have heard from his own mouth in
taped broadcasts, which I have seen, he has some serious misconceptions about
Islamic law because you cannot claim that American civilians are halal to
kill; you cannot say that. No matter what your disagreements are with the
foreign policy of this country, civilians are civilians, and we do not believe
in killing innocent civilians.
Now, I have never met him; I do not
know him, and I really do not know very much; I have only heard clips and such.
Irrespective of who he is, I know that at one time, he was considered a hero and
a freedom fighter by the Reagan administration. That is a fact. He was trained
by the CIA. He was initially sent to Afghanistan by the Saudi government's
backing, and he collected a lot of money. He built some hospitals and some
charity organizations; he did a lot of good in that area. Now, though, the
problem is that according to Islamic law, he does not represent legitimate state
authority. He has no authority to declare war on anybody. He is not the
khalifah. If he represents 3,000 men, those people are whom he represents.
There are a lot of Muslims around the world that feel this kind of solidarity
with him, and I think that it is misplaced emotionalism. It is a romantic type
of image of an individual standing up. It is like David versus Goliath, and as I
explained to Ed Bradley, America loves underdogs that stand up against all odds.
Hollywood movies are filled with these types of characters.
Saddam Hussein is considered a hero
to some Muslims. The guy is one of the worst criminals in the history of Muslim
rulers. The man is a criminal. He has killed incredible amounts of people,
gassed his own people and other Muslims, but here is a guy that postures and
says, "the Mother of all Battles," and unfortunately the Muslims are in a
beleaguered, defeated, and humiliated state, and so anybody that raises their
head and shows this kind of posturing is seen as a hero by a lot of Muslims who
feel this gung-ho type of thing. However, it is very dangerous for us to say
that Osama Bin Laden represents Muslim law because he does not. He does not have
that authority, and people have to understand that by shari'a, he does
not have that authority. The only people who can declare jihad are
legitimate rulers, and none of these groups has that legitimacy. I am sorry, but
that is shari'a, and I challenge anybody to bring textual evidence for
proof otherwise.
Shaykh Hamza: I did not say the
Qur'an never mentions hur al-'ain. I said that the 72 virgins is not in
the Qur'an. It is in the hadith. About jihad, there is no verse
where jihad is specifically used to refer to war, and you can look
through the entire Qur'an. When Allah speaks about war, He uses the word
qital. Jihad is a general, comprehensive term that includes a
military endeavor that is for the truth, but it has the broadest meanings in the
Qur'an. It includes all that Muslims struggle to do. For example, building
schools is a jihad; fighting the nafs is a jihad; and so
forth. That is why the Qur'an does not limit the word. Juhud just means
struggle, and that was what I meant in the interview. There are verses where it
does refer to martial combat, but it does not specifically limit the term to
that one use, and that is why we do not have a "holy war," so to speak. The
struggle for the sake of Allah is a high thing.
What I said about hur al-'ain
is that the 72 virgins is not mentioned in the Qur'an. I did say that you have
to be very careful about literalism with the Qur'an. For example, the Qur'an
says about Allah, "there is nothing like Allah," and then what does Allah say
after that? He says, "and He is the All-Hearing and the All-Knowing." Well, how
would you know what All-Hearing and All-Knowing is if you did not have hearing
and knowing? Also, Allah sees, so how would you know what sight is if you did
not have sight? Allah gave you sight, but is your sight like the sight of Allah?
Absolutely not.
Now, Allah says about jannah
that it is something no eye has seen, and it never occurred to the human heart.
So, when you look at the other descriptions of paradise in the Qur'an, you have
to know that those are approximations. Do not think that Allah is describing
physical types of things that we know of in this world. That is what Imam Al-Ghazali
said, and that is what the 'ulama say. One of the things that some people
are trying to use against Islam is that they say we envision paradise as being
this type of sexual romp or something like that, which is a terrible thing. For
the human being, the highest level of pleasure is in sexual relations, and
therefore, it would be appropriate, according to what Imam Al-Ghazali says, to
give some indication of the pleasures of paradise by talking about something
that human beings know about, which is that experience, because the majority of
human beings do not have intense mystical experiences in their life. There are
mystics who do have these experiences that are very profound and intense, but
most people do not. The most intense experience that they will have of pleasure
is in this act, and when Allah describes the pleasures of paradise, He uses
those examples because they are close to people's understandings.
That is not to say that hur al-'ain
do not exist because they are real. However, to think that they are somehow
related to the bestial elements of this world is incorrect. Allah says that
these are pure beings. Paradise is total purity, so, it is about purity; its not
about anything that relates to the mud of this world; that is euros. It is in
the world. So, I said that because I think that sometimes people misunderstand
the way Muslims view paradise. For example, what is in it for the women? What do
the women get? Well, jealousy is removed from their hearts, they say. Allah says
that both of them get their rewards. Believing men and believing women get the
same rewards in paradise. Another thing to remember is that the highest station
in paradise is the presence of Allah; it has nothing to do with any sensual
description. The lowest jannah is the jannah of food and drink,
and those are just approximations. Do not think that paradise is going to be
just eating and drinking like here. It is not.
Shaykh Hamza: I think that is for
Allah to judge. I believe people are taken to account based on what they know.
According to Imam Al-Ghazali, and Shaykh Murabit al-Hajj told me this as well,
if people have not heard the message of Islam, they are not taken to account for
Islam. I think that people who do good deeds, according to our beliefs, are
rewarded for the good that they do. Even Abu-Lahab is given water in the
hellfire for freeing a slave the day that the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa
sallam was born, and that is in a sound hadith. If Abu Lahab, the
worst enemy of the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam is rewarded for
the good he did in this world, our Lord is a Just Lord, and He rewards good. So,
what I did say is that if there were martyrs in this situation, then certainly
they would be those people, but I cannot say who is a martyr and who is not.
Even if a Muslim dies fi sabilillah, you hope that he is a martyr, but
you cannot say with any certainty because it is for Allah to decide if it was
sincerely for the sake of Allah, but they were heroic people; they were good
people. The man I sat next to that night in Washington was one of the heroes of
that day, and I told him it is an honor sitting next to you. He was an Irish
fireman from New York, and he said in response, "Don't say that. I shouldn't
even be here; I was just doing my job." That is literally what he said to me in
total sincerity. Then I said to him, "You guys did a great job," and he said,
"No, we didn't." He said, "We should have gotten a lot more people out of
there," and he said the city has a lot to answer for because that was a very
poorly executed operation. He said a lot more people should be alive.
Shaykh Hamza: Finding out about Islam
is a really good thing to do to help. I would really recommend Dr. Thomas
Cleary's, The Essential Koran. I think it is a really useful introduction
because the Qur'an has verses about which even Muslims need to know the
interpretations, and there are all these translations out there without
interpretations. There are verses like, "strike them if they're disobedient"
referring to women, and the outward of that ayah does not mean what it
appears, and it cannot be used to justify domestic violence.
Shaykh Hamza: This question is about
the shooting of the Muslim woman in the head in public. I have never heard of
that as a punishment. I know that if you look at the hudud, what are
called the penal laws of Islam, you are supposed to try to avoid implementing
these penal punishments as much as you are able to, and that is the real spirit
of the shari'a. I would say that Afghanistan is in a condition right now
where you cannot implement the had punishments. Sayyiduna Umar removed
had punishments during a famine because people who would not normally steal
were stealing, and I think that conditions are extreme in Afghanistan right now.
For instance, with adultery, you have to look at how many men have been killed
in Afghanistan. How many women are completely on their own now? The shari'a
is a merciful law. It teaches people to look for mercy.
I think people locally really need to
help ING. They need more volunteers, more full-time people, and you need to
sacrifice with your wealth and your time as well. I think it is really important
to help those organizations that are most effective. I feel sorry for the entire
Afghani population, not just there, but here as well. They are people who have
just seen too much pain and suffering, like the Palestinians and like other
Muslim peoples, and our hearts need to be with them; they really do. The Jews
have seen a lot of suffering also; they really have. A lot of what goes on in
Palestine is a result of the type of interiorization of the abuse and
humiliation that they experienced in Europe, and a lot of people do not realize
that. They have internalized that humiliation and treatment. Dr. Cleary
mentioned how they used to make the Jews run naked through the streets in
European cities and whip them and spit on them. People forget that. So, there is
a lot of suffering out there, and I think that we should be more compassionate.
Shaykh Hamza: He has allegiance to
the king of Saudi Arabia, and that is who his bay'ah is with. All Saudi
citizens are required to take bay'ah with the king of Saudi Arabia, so
that is their concern.
Shaykh Hamza: That is sad because my
family had an opposite reaction. I am really sorry about that. This is one of
the unfortunate repercussions.
Shaykh Hamza: I think that the best
way to help, if you do lack the knowledge and things like that, is to support
the organizations that are doing this type of work. That is the best you can do.
I want to thank all of you, in sha
Allah, for coming. Don't give up. If anyone wants to know who is really
behind the conspiracy, know that it is Iblis. He is our avowed enemy, so just
recognize that, and do not go into despair. Do dhikr; remember Allah; do
the Prophetic Invocations or other dhikr. Do dhikr. This is
a time to really be in a state of dhikr. Have love, mahabba; have
some love. This is a time to put aside our petty differences because we are
facing much, much greater things. Really, have some respect for your Muslim
brothers and sisters. As for the ones who are making mistakes out there, just
forgive them, and know that they are trying. There are some fools amongst us,
and they are often worse than our enemies. Like they say, give me an intelligent
enemy and not a stupid friend. It is Arab proverb because they say a stupid
friend harms you when he thinks he is trying to help you. At least with an
intelligent enemy, you know he is trying to harm you. So, barak Allah fikum.
| |
|