|
|
|
|
Chapter I Theory of Evolution
Among those of the contemporary materialistic ideologies and concepts which pose a challenge to the religious faiths, the theory of evolution is a major one. It is more an hypothesis than a fact and several attempts to prove it as a scientific fact have turned futile. Being one of the modern age’s most contentious issue, it has attracted good deal of intellectual efforts and discussion. The issue has inspired a lot of experimentation in farms, orchards and laboratories. During such experiments chimpanzees have been tamed and trained to produce out of them human beings. The quest for biological samples has led the scientists to remote corners of the earth, to the ocean beds, and excavation of fossil remains. Their findings have been carried in thousands of books and tomes all over the world. It is a ceaseless debate and the issue has only gathered further knots. Yet the theory of evolution remains to be proved. Nothing in the findings so far proves it conclusively in order that it could be included in the laws of nature. All those evidences and arguments marshaled in its proof merely are in the nature of hypotheses. Even in the scientific world, it has increasingly come to be categorised under myths rather than among the facts. It has to be borne in mind that most of the world scientists are agnostics which is a gray area between religion and atheism and emerges out of man’s admitted inability to gather knowledge about metaphysical world. They stand against the atheists and believers. Supporters of the theory of evolution mostly emerge from among the materialists. A considerable section of scientists from the believing category have, however countered the theory on the scientific lines. The conflict on the score has been continuing. But since the atheists dominate the scientific and cultural activity, they seem to have an upper hand. UPThough all that has been written against evolution is voluminous, a few samples will suffice; The Encyclopaedia of Ignorance published by the Oxford carries articles from 60 noted scientific scholars. One of these articles has been titled as “Fallacies of Evolution Theory”. It concludes that the man’s knowledge about evolution is nil and to regard this knowledge as `factual’ is a fallacy. Its author Tomlin writes at the end : The present impasse in evolutionary thinking productive of so many fallacies, is due chiefly to the interpretation of biological fact in terms of out-of-date physical theory. 1Another biologist, Chardin writes in his book entitled The Phenomenon of Man: No amount of historical research will ever reveal the details of this story. Unless the science of tomorrow is able to reconstruct the process in the laboratory, we shall probably never find any material vestige of this emergence of the microscopic from the molecular, of the organic from the chemical, of the living from the pre-living. 2Lecomte Du Nouy, the noted French researcher and author of the marvelous treatise Human Destiny dismissed the theory of chance and Genesis by itself (spontaneous generation) through a massive mathematical analysis and says that the biological origin cannot be solved without accepting a miracle. He goes on to prove that even the existing age of the earth is not sufficient to produce a molecule by accidental accumulation of various elements in a particular proportion. He writes: However, if this happened and we maintained our confidence in the calculus of probabilities it would be equivalent to admitting a miracle, and the result would be ONE SINGLE MOLECULE, or at most two or three. Life itself is not even in question but merely one of the substances which constitute living beings. Now one molecule is of no use. Hundreds of millions of identical ones are necessary. 3He further writes: In the second place, it has been shown that, on the basis of our present knowledge, namely, by using the same methods which have been proved so useful for the interpretation of our inanimate world, it was impossible to explain, or to account for, not only the birth of life but even the appearance of the substances which seemed to be required to build life, namely, highly dissymmetrical molecules. 4Another among the noted researchers Dr. Isaac Asimov while discussing the mysterious constitution of DNA, stresses that there is strong relationship between the origin of life and religious faith. He attributes this to the apologetic explanations offered by the scientists about the mysteries of life on earth. He writes: Without DNA, living organism could not reproduce, and life as we know it could not have started. All the substances of living matter - enzymes and all the others, whose production is catalysed by enzymes - depend in the last analysis on DNA. How, then, did DNA, and life start? This is a question that science has always hesitated to ask, because the origin of life has been bound up with religious beliefs even more strongly than has the origin of the earth and the universe. It is still dealt with only hesitantly and apologetically. 5He further writes: Pasteur’s demonstration apparently laid the theory of Spontaneous generation to rest permanently. 6This summarises the argument that the scientists are totally unaware of life, root or genesis of life. In other words they are ignorant of the alphabets of life. How could the man be competent to discuss the “changes” in life in the absence of any definitive knowledge about the life itself? The scientists' claim on this score could thus be likened to the description of an elephant by perception of its limbs and body portions by hands in darkness. Have the scientists experimented on those variations and changes in nature or in laboratories which they claim to have occurred in various species of life on earth? In reality, the explanations offered by Darwin and his followers for the evolution of new species of living organisms are only hypothetical in nature as they were based on certain similarities between various forms of life. He only assumed that certain life forms had developed from certain other proximate life forms. But he could not set any scientific links based on principles, nor provided any empirical observations. Even scientists admit that to set a demarcation line between two proximate species is as difficult as witnessing the evolutionary changes. Therefore J. Mynard Smith, a staunch advocate of Neo-Darwinism, while discussing with basic elements of evolution (change of genes, selection and migration) concludes that evolutionary changes cannot be examined directly. 7He begins his study thus: There are a lot of things we do not know about evolution. 8The reality is that “life” and its “growth” are such divine mysteries which can never be unraveled, however hard man tries to do so. All the material that has been advanced to establish the evolution theory reduces to mere hypotheses or theories which remain roofless to the end. UPThe question that why does the scientific community insist on the evolution theory when it is not scientifically substantiated, will require a good deal of discussion. It was rather misfortune of the science that scientists were forced out of the realm of religion to study the nature’s phenomena independently. The universal popularity of the theory of evolution owes itself to the Church’s antagonistic attitude towards science in the Medieval ages. While this led to hatred against religion on one hand, and on the other, motivated them to look for materialistic interpretation for the nature’s phenomena. This even prompted Darwin to organize his disparate thoughts in a book, Origin of Species which was published from London in 1859. Darwin was basically not a materialist. He was a believer in God. But his book brought convulsions in the intellectual circles and evoked a ground swell of support to the atheism and materialism. It was as if the materialists had discovered a mountain of support for their cause. The materialistic trends that had sprung in the 18th and 19th centuries drew sustenance from it and rose in revolt openly against the religious faiths. But it received major support from two more quarters: Communists and Jews. The Zionists and Freemasons, the organs of Judaism used them as tools. Support from the Communists was obvious as Communism bases itself on denial of God and materialistic philosophy. But Jewish support for the cause must appear to be bizarre. The Zionists and Freemasons merely used it as a tool for achieving their desired goal of ridding the world nations of all moral codes and taboos, thereby facilitating their own hold over them. The Jews followed a policy of merely propagating it. This is how the theory of evolution progressed from a hypothesis, to a concept and then into a faith, in so far as it is claiming itself as a parallel to the religious faith. Sold to the people under the label of science, it appears to be attractive. Devoid of any scientific spirit as it is, it can hardly claim for itself a place in science which does not have any scope for ‘blind faith’. But it is a misfortune of science that it did not emerge unscathed from the onslaught of materialism. A real scientific spirit demands a scrutiny of any hypothesis and admitting of the results. It is therefore ironical that the modern intellectuals to whom the followers of religion were “fanatics” and “obscurantists” are themselves no better. Having created the theory of evolution, they seem to be insistent on its acceptance as a fact by all. Refusal to accept brings reprisals in the form of allegations. The situation could only be summed up thus: The Church’s monopoly and domination over human thought has been replaced by materialistic domination. The Church’s dictatorship has yielded place for materialistic dictatorship. It is their writ that runs over the intellectual circles and has been responsible in stifling the scientific argument in order that the masses followed the materialist doctrine. Science has come handy as a tool of the game . Professor Duane T.Gish writes: The majority of the scientific community and educational circles are using the clock of “science” to force the teaching of their views of life upon all. The authoritarianism of the Medieval Church has been replaced by the authoritarianism of rationalistic materialism. Constitutional guarantees are violated and free scientific enquiry is stifled under this blanket of dogmatism. 9It is merely the intellectual authoritarianism that has sustained the theory of evolution. And the materialist lobby knows it too well that it could be only replaced by the theory of creation which will inevitably invite faith in God. Since faith in God will have far reaching implications for their entire attitude towards life, the materialists are hugging the hypothetical doctrine tightly. According to Dr. Dewer, those who refuse to show allegiance to this doctrine are considered worthy of positions in institutions with preponderance of materialist lobby. Their research papers and articles are rejected by research magazines and their manuscripts hardly ever get published by the reputed publishing houses. 10History is only repeating itself. The quest of untruth has only prompted the intellectuals to suppress the religious beliefs as was the case with them once upon a time. UPMore than the scientists, the protagonists of atheism and their organisations have been active in backing up the evolution theory. Even the Marxists, Zionists and Freemasons have taken a lead role in fulfilling this task. The Jews have always been keen to root out religion and religious values. The Jews have always secretly harbored ambitions to rule over the world. Their Protocols bear the testimony to such long cherished dreams. Its quest has prompted them to work for uprooting of religious and ethical values and promotion of all secular atheistic beliefs, materialistic philosophies and ‘isms’. They believe that its achievement should precede with striking at the moral foundations of each nation. Even a cursory glance over the world intellectual scene would reveal that Jews have dominated it during the last two centuries. Karl Marx, the founder of Marxism; Freud, who advocated the sexual liberalism and Durkheim who conceived the collective materialism, rose from among the Jews. 11Although Darwin was not a Jew, but his theory of evolution fitted ideally into the Jewish scheme of things. Jews therefore became its chief propagators. Propagation of Darwinism and Marxism enjoyed a high priority in the Zionist agenda and was included in their Protocols as obligatory. A compilation of Protocols entitled The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 12 carried its third Protocol thus:The goyim 13 have lost the habit of thinking unless promoted by the suggestions of our specialists. Therefore they don’t see the urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes, shall adopt at once, namely this, that it is essential to reach in national schools one simple, true piece of knowledge, the basis of all knowledge , the knowledge of the structure of human life, of social existence, which requires division of labor, and consequently the division of men into classes and conditions. In the present state of knowledge and direction we have given to its development, the people, blindly believing things in print cherishes, thanks to promptings intended to mislead and its own ignorance a blind hatred towards all conditions which it considers above itself, for it has no understanding of the meaning of class and condition.14This excerpt only serves as a preface, hinting at the ambitions of Jews. Another excerpt highlights the need to use philosophy of Darwin, Marx and Nietzsche to annihilate the religious faiths:- Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietscheism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the mind of the goyim. It is indispensable for us to take account of the thoughts, characters, tendencies of the nations in order to avoid making slips in the political system and in the direction of administrative affairs. The triumph of our system, of which the component parts of the machinery may be variously disposed according to the temperament of the people not on our way, will fail of success it the practical application of it be not based upon summing up of the lessons of the past in the light of the present. 15The book exhorts the Jews at another place: Though Darwin is not a Jew, but we know how to propagate his views and use them for sabotaging the religion and morals. 16Any study of the Protocols will be an eye-opener. The Zionists and Freemasons had much to do with the ethnic, national, sectarian, linguistic, economic, cultural, regional, political, international crises and disorder in the present-day world directly or indirectly. The Encyclopaedia Britannica has the following note on the book, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion: Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, fraudulent document that served as a pretext and rationale for anti-Semitism. The document purports to be a report of a series of 24 (in other versions, 27) meetings held at Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, at the time of the first Zionist Congress. There Jews and Freemasons were said to have made plans to disrupt Christian civilisation and erect a world state under their joint rule. Liberalism and socialism were to be the means of subverting Christiandom. If subversion failed, all the capitals of Europe were to be sabotaged. 17The book was first published in 1903. In 1921 it was dubbed as a fake document. 18 But it is apparent that such a claim was made only to avert the embarrassment.Whatever may be the truth, the book is a very revealing document of Zionist plans and plots. Only three of its copies exist in the world. One of them was purchased by the Egyptian Government in 1951 for UK Pounds 500 and is the only volume in the entire Middle East. 19All this should explain the background of the hypothetical base of the theory of creation which has hitherto paraded under the garb of scientific fact. It has been used as a double-edged sword, on one hand to negate the existence of God and on the other to obliterate the remnants of the religion and morality. But any intellectual scrutiny is bound to reveal its real worth. UP1. Duncan, Ronald & Westen-Smith, Miranda, eds., The Encyclopaedia of Ignorance, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978, P.234. 2. Yusuf, Mohammed Ali, Masraud Darwiniah, Darus Shrooq, Jeddah, 1403 A.H., P.36. 3. Coley, Noel G. & Vance M.D.Hall, eds., Darwin to Einstein, Primary Sources on Science and Beliefs, Longman, Essex, 1980, P. 268. 4. Ibid., P.270. 5. Asimov’s Guide to Science, Vol. 2, The Biological Sciences, Pelican Books, Middlesex, 1978, Pp.172-73. 6. Ibid., P.174. 7. Smith, J. Mynard, “The Limitations of Evolution Theory” in The Encyclopaedia of Ignorance, P.236. 8. Ibid. 9. Yusuf, Mohd. Ali, Masraud Darwiniah, Darus Shrooq, Jeddah, 1403 A.H., P.65. 10. Ibid., P.64. 11. For details see At Tataur was Sabat fi Hayatil Bashariah by Mohammed Qutub. 12. Zion is the name of a mountain near Jerusalem over which the city of Daud was built. For the Jews it is sacred and is the center of worship. 13. Goyim is a Hebrew word which the Talmud and other Jewish scriptures use for non-Jews and is synonymous with unclean, swine or disbeliever. The Jews consider all non-Jews unclean just as Brahmins considered non-Brahmins as Malechcha. 14. Jewish Conspiracy, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Kuwait, 1969, Pp. 37-38. 15. Ibid., Pp.32-33. 16. Yusuf, Mohd. Ali, Masraud Darwiniah, P.61. 17. Encyclopaedia Britannica (Micropaedia), 1983, Vol. VIII, P.253. 18. The Macmillan Encyclopaedia, London, 1981, P.995. 19. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Kuwait
Copyright FURQANIA ACADEMY TRUST. All rights reserved. |
|
|
Send mail to
webmaster@wponline.org with questions or comments about this web site. |
