recent issues


News Clips ...
Initial Responses to US Bombing in Sudan and Afghanistan ...

USA Bombed Sudan and Afganistan


FBI Director: No Conclusions in US Embassy Bombing

NAIROBI, Kenya -- FBI Director Louis Freeh declared Friday, day after US strikes in Sudan and Afghanistan, he had come to ``no final conclusions'' about who bombed two U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania two weeks ago. Clinton administration officials said were linked to a wealthy Saudi militant, Osama bin Laden. ``We have made no final conclusions,'' Freeh said. ``We are at a fairly preliminary stage, the investigation is only two weeks old.'' [AP]


Yeltsin Condemns U.S. Attacks

MURMANSK, Russia -- Boris Yeltsin denounced American attacks on alleged terrorist sites in Sudan and Afghanistan, telling reporters Friday that the U.S. action was ``indecent.'' ``I am indignant, and I condemn (them),'' Yeltsin said. ``I didn't know that this strike would be carried out, and that means the whole world was unaware of that. And this makes the strike even more indecent.'' In the State Duma, the Lower House of Russian parliament, Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov said the United States was ``moving toward a policy of state terrorism.'' The Duma also passed a resolution urging the government to consider canceling a Sept. 1-3 Moscow summit between Yeltsin and Clinton. The Duma also hinted it may again postpone ratification of the START-II arms reduction treaty. [AP]


UK engineers say no chemical weapons at Sudan plant

LONDON (Reuters) - A British engineer who worked at the factory in Sudan attacked by the United States last week told Sunday's Observer newspaper that it was not used to make chemical weapons. ``I have intimate knowledge of that factory and it just does not lend itself to the manufacture of chemical weapons,'' Tom Carnaffin, who worked as technical manager for the plant's owners between 1992 and 1996, told the Observer. ``It (the factory) just isn't equipped to cope with the demands of chemical weapon manufacturing,'' Carnaffin said.


Sudanese President Criticizes U.S.

KHARTOUM, Sudan -- ``Clinton and America will have to pay!'' Sudan's president proclaimed Friday, rallying his citizens in the aftermath of an U.S. missile strike. President Omar el-Bashir held an emergency meeting Friday with his Cabinet, then said Sudan could ``prove that the factory is specifically for pharmaceutical production'' and not the chemical weapons plant described by U.S. officials. He also said "we will not be bullied by Americans." Sudan television said the factory, which opened in 1996, produced about half of the country's medicines. Its main products were reported to be antibiotics and drugs to treat malaria and tuberculosis. The United Nations confirmed Friday that it had contracted the el-Shifa plant to supply 100,000 liters of veterinary pharmaceuticals for Iraq under the oil-for-food program. El-Bashir recalled Sudanese diplomats from Washington and said his government would file complaints about the American strike with the United Nations, the Arab League and the Organization of African Unity. Sidahmed Hajj Hamad, administrative director at the factory, estimated the damage at $100 million. Pills, smashed plastic medicine bottles and paper cartons were scattered over the ground. ``The timing was chosen to serve the wish of a sexual pervert and maniac to divert attention away from his crumbling credibility and reputation,'' a statement from the Sudanese Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, said. [AP]


Muslim Leader Killed in Russia

MAKHACHKALA, Russia -- A local Muslim leader was killed in a car bombing Friday in Russia's southern region of Dagestan, officials said. Dagestan is an overwhelmingly Muslim majority region of Russia, which is following the path of Chechnya. Mufti Said-Mohammad Abubakarov, Dagestan's Muslim leader, died along with his brother when their car was blown up by a radio-controlled bomb after prayers at the main mosque in Makhachkala, the regional capital. Their driver also was killed, the ITAR-Tass news agency reported. [AP]


White House: Israel won't accept U.S. pullback proposal

The Clinton administration has told Palestinian negotiators it sees no chance that Israel will accept a U.S. peace proposal for a further pullback in the West Bank, and the administration is urging the Palestinians to get the best deal they can in direct negotiations, White House officials confirmed to CNN on Thursday. [CNN]


Indonesian Muslim group launches political party

Indonesia's largest Muslim group, Nadlatul Ulama (NU), officially launched a new political party on Thursday to contest general elections expected in May next year. The Nation Awakening Party (Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa) will be led by Matori Abdul Djalil, a former member of the Muslim-oriented United Development Party (PPP). [CNN]


Bangladesh floods kill 375, threaten Dhaka dam

Floods sweeping Bangladesh have killed at least 242 people and destroyed the homes or disrupted the lives of millions, disaster control officials said on Friday. [Associated Press]


Chechnya’s president survives assassination attempt

Chechnya's president narrowly survived an assassination attempt Thursday when a car bomb badly damaged his motorcade and seriously wounded his bodyguards in the capital of the rebel republic, news reports said. [Associated Press]


Tehran mayor sentenced to five years in prison.

The reformist mayor of Tehran was sentenced Thursday to five years in prison on corruption charges. [CNN]


India reported to have nuclear subs by 2007

India will launch its first nuclear-powered submarine within the next eight to nine years, Jane's Defense Weekly said on Thursday. Official Indian sources quoted by the magazine said the keel for what is known as the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) will be laid by 2001/2, two years after completion of land tests on its reactor. This will be followed by its launch around 2006/7, the authoritative magazine said. [CNN]


Philippine Muslim group in talks plea to Estrada

Zamboanga City, Philippine: Changes in the government peace panel and recent bloody clashes with the military led the Philippines' largest Moslem separatist group to urge President Joseph Estrada yesterday to speed up the peace process in the south to avert war. Ghazali Jaafar, chief peace negotiator for the Moro islamic Liberation Front (MILF), said the group fears the removal of four members of the government negotiating panel will further stall the talks suspended since May. "There will be war in the south if the peace talks failed," Jaafar said. "We do not want these hostilities to happen." [AP]


Clinton Administration asked to work toward International War Crime Court’s demise.

WASHINGTON -- Frustrated by the United States' failure to get the kind of international war crimes court it wanted, Senate critics asked the Clinton administration to work toward the court's demise. Sen. Rod Grams, R-Minn., said Thursday he hoped the war crimes tribunal approved by 120 countries in Rome last week would ``share the same fate as the League of Nations, and collapses without U.S. support.'' In a major diplomatic setback, the United States declined to sign a treaty creating the court it promoted for years because American officials felt the final accord yielded too much prosecutorial power to the new court, leaving U.S. troops and citizens vulnerable to what they said was potentially unfair prosecution. Instead, the United States watched much of the world, including most of its closest allies, approve the treaty in spite of long-argued U.S. reservations. In voting against it, the United States found itself siding only with countries frequently accused of human rights violations: Iraq, China, Libya, Qatar, Yemen and Israel. [AP]


Israel interrogation deplored

GENEVA: A UN rights panel yesterday said it was "deeply concerned" by Israel's use of "moderate physical pressure" against alleged terrorists during interrogation to extract information crucial to saving lives. The UN Human Rights Committee issued a series of conclusions following examination of an Israeli government report on the Jewish State’s compliance with an international civil and political rights treaty. [Gulf-Times]

Initial Responses to US Bombing in Sudan and Afghanistan
Responses cited here not necessarily reflect the official opinion of Witness-Pioneer

"Did you (O Muhammad (Peace be upon him)) not see (thought) how your Lord dealt with 'Ad (people)?"
"Who were very tall like lofty pillars," " The like of which were not created in the land?" "And (with) Tham
(people), who cut (hewed) out rocks in the valley (to make dwellings)?" "And (with) Fir'aun (Pharaoh), who
had pegs (who used to torture men by binding them to pegs)?" "Who did transgress beyond bounds in the
lands (in the disobedience of Allbh)" " And made therein much mischief." " So your Lord poured on them
different kinds of severe torment" "Verily, your Lord is Ever Watchful (over them
)"

Al-Qur'an 89 : 6-14

Terrorism and Double-Standard

"Taking a firm stand against terrorism" that is how the recent attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan is justified. My question is how do we fight terrorism? With terrorism, according to the US government. I am so baffled at how the majority of the American public is swallowing these lies. How can you justify killing innocent people as "retaliation" to killing innocent people? I am firmly against terrorism and so therefore I must state that I am firmly against the actions Clinton took today.

The anger and frustration that is in my heart, I am not eloquent enough to express. What angers me is the arrogance of America. Who do we think we are? Why do we see our selves as the police of the world? Why is it that when other "third world" countries defend themselves from terrorism, they are labeled as uncivilized human rights violators? Yet when America attacks innocent people, we are bold, freedom loving defenders?

I ask you to open your eyes to the truth. We are not the only people on the face of this earth. We are not superior to others and others have a right to not like us. They do not have the right to kill us, and if they do, we have the right to defend ourselves from them. The perpetuators of the crimes must be brought to justice. Yet, I wonder what ever happened to the rule "innocent before proven guilty"? There was a large amount of evidence that certain people and groups committed the recent bombing of US embassy and so that suddenly gave us the right to punish them? What ever happened to a fair trial? And what ever gave us the right to kill innocent people in trying to kill the suspects?

And lets talk about these suspects? Oh yes, who else could they be, but "islamic fundamentalists"? I mean, it was, after all, them who bombed the building in Oklahoma...oh, well, maybe not. But it was too late; the accusations were already put forth. As a result, Muslims in America were killed and angered Americans burned their mosques. My point is the media is aware that talking about terrorism and Islam together cause great problems for the Muslim community in America and all over the world. Yet they continue to do so. However, can we blame the media? After all, there are plenty of so called Muslims who declare holy war or jihad on America in the name of Islam. Yet, it is a fact that Islam according to its two sources (the Qur'an and saying of Muhammad) does not support terrorism and war is only in self-defense. There are nearly ten million Muslims in America who are peaceful contributors to American society. How can the media say islamic extremists, who want to establish a society based on Muslim ideas, commit these terrorist acts? Muslim ideas constitute peace, not terrorism. All I ask is that when the media uses Islam and terrorism together, they clarify what Islam really stands for, and they clarify that our Muslim neighbors are also equally against terrorism. We can not let these people claiming to be islamic corrupt our understanding of true Islam and of the Muslims here in America as well as the Muslims all over the world.

I ask you to open your eyes to the truth and see that innocent people died in Sudan and Afghanistan and that the perpetuators of the horrible bombings in Kenya and Tanzania are still walking around. Don't you see that the US government is trying to convince us that its inhumane actions are justifiable under the cloud of fighting terrorism? I ask that you take everything you hear and read with a grain of salt. Question the actions that were taken and don’t believe that any government fights wars for the good of humanity.

I end with some questions for you to ponder.

Did you know that of the 263 people, who died in the US embassy bombings, 12 were Americans?

How is it that in just 2 weeks time, the government conducted an investigation and proved that the pharmaceutical factory in Sudan was actually making deadly nerve gas?

anonymous


O Allah! Perish the hands of the enemies of Islam

"Yes if you remain firm, and act right, even if the enemy should rush here
on you in hot haste , your Lord would help you................Allah made it but
a message of hope for you, and an assurance to your hearts:( in any case )
there is no help except from Allah, the Exalted , the Wise. That He might
cut off a fringe of the unbelievers or expose them to infamy , and they
should then be turned back, frustrated of their purpose."

Al-Qur'an 3 : 124-127

"Allah has promised those amongst you who believe, and do righteous
good deeds, that He will Certainly grant them succession to the present
rulers on the Earth, as He granted it to those before them; that He will
establish in authority their religion--the one which He has chosen for
them; and that He will change their state, after the fear in which they
lived, to one of security and peace: They worship Me alone and not
associate aught with Me. If any do reject Faith after this,
they are Rebellious and Wicked."

Al-Qur'an 24 : 55

by Syeda Sultana Razia


Other motives behind the bombing?

A British engineer, who had been intimately familiar with the plant in Sudan that has recently been bombed by the USA, claimed that the plant was not capable of making components for chemical weapons. In fact this poor country, which can’t even provide food for everyone in there, gets 50% of its medicine supply from this plant. Also UN confirmed that this pharmaceutical company had offered to supply $200 million dollar worth of medicine to Iraq under Iraq’s oil-for-food program. Many African leaders had visited this factory including officials from Kenya prior to the bombing. Knowing all these, what might have been the motive behind attacking a Pharmaceutical factory?

In recent years, Sudan has been trying to become more self-sufficient. Being the only Sunni islamic State it had been facing continuous interference by western powers. Sudan is just recovering from a long famine. Also the country has been busy fighting the rebels in the south. Moreover it had no prior history of using weapons of mass-destruction. Then why did USA bomb a factory that brings hard money to its economy?

Is it a deliberately created obstruction for the country to stand on her own feet and develop itself?

One can only wonder !!!

by R.K.

"Our Lord! Lay not on us a burden greater than we have strength to bear.
Blot out our sins, and grant us forgiveness. Have mercy on us. Thou art our
Protector; Help us against those who stand against faith (the disbeliever )."

Al-Qur'an 2 : 286


Back to home page

Prev Up Index Page First Page Next