Capitalism
Origin:
In Europe in the fifth century AD after the decline of the western Roman
Empire, feudalism came into being. This new system was supported by the
Christian church, which spoke in the name of Allah. It did not, however,
have any divine law or sound guiding principles of its own. Feudalism was
a new development in Europe and the church cooperated with it, covering
it in a garb of sacred and divine ordinances.
Between
the fourteenth and the sixteenth centuries_ the traditional period which
changed the history of Europe from the middle ages to the modern era _
all aspects of Western life began to take shape and the centers of wealth,
power and culture began to leave the provinces and feudal estates and to
accumulate in big cities. At the head of this movement were traders, usurers
and bourgeois craftsmen who benefited from the prospects offered by that
development. These people used to live in towns and cities and go frequently
abroad, they were the first to receive the rich which poured into their
country from outside and which forced them to adapt themselves to the new
dictates of change and development. But how was this possible while an insurmountable
obstacle in the form of the ecclesiastical rules which supported
the feudalists stood in their way?
A hard tussle between the two parties ensued a total war which covered
all fields of social life. The last round in that bout was won by the new
system which preached the principles of freedom, modernism, tolerance and
broader outlook in all walks of life, whether it be religion, philosophy,
politics or economy.
With
the help of these principles, people wanted to remove all obstacles from
the path of the free and modern man. This led to two diametrically opposed
parties - the freedom preached by the bourgeoisie led in one direction,
while the narrow-minded feudalist church led in another. Each of the two
parties harbored enmity towards the other and each of them had its self
interest. One of the two parties exploited the name of Allah, religion
and ethics to defend their concocted beliefs and ancient oppressive rights, while the other exploited the principles of freedom and tolerance
to shake the truths which were inherent in religion and morality. They
devised the concept which stated that there is no need to observe moral
principles in furthering one's aims and interests.
Besides the feudal church they fashioned the idols of provincialism or
regionalism - those harmful and accursed concepts which were responsible
for the wars and strife of the time. For the first time, they established
the idea of taking interest which was unanimously considered as illegal
by the thinkers of earlier times. It was forbidden and made illegal not
only in the Bible and the Holy Quran, but by Aristotle and Plato also and
it was prohibited by Roman and Greek law. In the name of freedom and tolerance
the bourgeoisie succeeded in snatching these rights from the feudal church.
Having taken into their hands, they were overjoyed and considered
themselves as sole proprietors of them.
In the ecstasy of victory they forgot that there was an inferior class
to themselves which had suffered hard ships at the hands of the feudalists
and which had the right to get its share of the fruits of the new and free
system. I do not know why their liberalism and tolerance faded away so
quickly. When parliamentary government was set up in England, for instance,
and real sovereignty was transferred in the parliament from the nobles
to the commoners, the bourgeoisie, missionaries of freedom, tolerance and
wide outlook, assumed completed sovereignty themselves. In denying the
peoples their rights of franchise, the arguments and reasons by which they
had benefited were forgotten.
Following the industrial revolution and the inventor of the machine in
the eighteenth century, the heat of the struggle became intense, At that
time, industrial production and raw materials were available on a large
scale. Similarly, the consumption of manufactured goods took place to an
unprecedented degree. Here, the bourgeoisie who monopolized industry, trade
and wealth and dominated the fields of science and literature, seized the
opportunity and exploited the new scientific inventions in expanding their
spheres of influence.
This class pounced upon the opportunity and monopolized the modern scientific
inventions which helped it to expand its sphere of influence and sovereignty.
There was a three-fold obstacle in its way consisting of the kings of the
nation states who claimed to be gifted with divine authority, together
with the rich feudal lords and the men of the national church. The result
was a perpetual conflict and discord between the last two groups.
Later, the cult of freedom and modernism armed itself with a new weapon.
Its followers called for full economic freedom and asked for the adoption
of a republican system in the political field together with the giving
of full civil liberties to the individual. They also wanted him to enjoy
freedom in the social, cultural and moral fields.
Furthermore, they called for the restriction of the government's political
sovereignty to the minimum and for granting individuals the maximum of
liberty. The government, in their opinion, was nothing but an agency which
was assigned the task of administering justice amongst individuals, preventing
them from interfering with each other and safeguarding individual liberty.
They also wanted social and economic life to be in conformity with the
activities actions and ideas of individuals. The government, they suggested, should not interfere in an individual's
affairs because, in their opinion. It was not meant to play an active role
nor to assume leadership. Thus it was that these people exaggerated and
spent all of their efforts in glorifying freedom, tolerance and individual
nihilism.
The economic
system, based on the absolute theory of free economy, was the last step
in the development of that movement, adopting as its name (the new capitalist
system)
|